Thursday, March 26, 2020
Who Killed Jfk Essay Example For Students
Who Killed Jfk? Essay Who Killed JFK?Who Killed JFK? You may ask why I say this, but itââ¬â¢s something you really needto know. If you believe that Lee Harvey Oswald killed him then you are taking part inprobably the biggest government conspiracy known to man. This massive cover-up willlast for years and probably violate every single law known to man. Well, when the people started to get suspicious about the mystery involving themurder, the government dispatched the Warren Commission to investigate and silence alldoubts concerning the mystery around the murder of President Kennedy. The warrencommission established a single bullet theory, which stated that two of PresidentKennedyââ¬â¢s wounds and all five of Governor Connallyââ¬â¢s were caused by the ââ¬Å"magicâ⬠bullet, to back up all claims that Lee Oswald was the only person shooting at thepresident. In September 1964 the Warren Commission stated that they could find noââ¬Å"credibleâ⬠evidence that there was a conspiracy. We will write a custom essay on Who Killed Jfk? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The Warren Commission also wanted the people to believe the fatal head shot thatkilled JFK was fired by Oswald. That means that the exit wound must be in the front ofthe head and the entrance wound in the back of the head. All of the eye witnesses,doctors, and nurses that saw the presidents head would of said that the exit of the bulletwas in the back of the head, which means that there was another shooter who was in frontof JFK. All of the real autopsy photographs of the presidents head showed that the exitwound was in the back of the head, hard proof that there was another shooter whichmeans conspiracy. Lee Oswald had no apparent motive to murder President Kennedy. There is not asingle known instance in Oswaldââ¬â¢s life where he expressed even a slight negativecomment in reference to President Kennedy. Right after the shooting Patrolman MarionBaker headed straight to where he thought the shots came from, The Texas School BookDepository, 105 seconds after the first shot, when he reached the second floor cafeteria bystairs, he saw Oswald sitting down drinking a coke, after a positive check to see ifOswald worked there he headed up the back stairs on pursuit. While in jail the policeinterrogated Oswald for twelve straight hours and failed to keep any written, tape, orvideo record of the interrogation. Before Oswald had any chance to consult a lawyer hewas killed by Jack Ruby when being transferred by police. Was Oswald a cover-up guyfor the government to place blame on?According to Robert Groden since November 1963, there have more than 400deaths of witnesses to the assignation of President Kennedy, witnesses to Lee Oswaldââ¬â¢sactivities, Jack Rubyââ¬â¢s associates, those involved in the medical procedures at ParklandHospital, and the autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital. The causes of these deaths aresometimes quite bazarre. Death by karate chop, gunshot, and slit throat are not exactlynatural causes of death, yet many obvious murders were deemed natural. The mostfamous person to die was news reporter, Dorthy Kilagallen, who was the only personallowed to interview Jack Ruby in jail. She stated that she would fly to New Orleans andbreak this mystery wide open. On November 8,1963 she was found dead of a massivebarbiturate overdose. Was this murder or not?Some people and groups who are possibly involved in the murder and cover-upare people at odds with JFK or who had something to gain over his death. One possibilityare tyrannical and ego-centric head of FBI J. Edgar Hoover, who was also at war withJFK. Some others are several powerful factions of the CIA a nd the Anti-Castro Cubancommunity over the Bay of Pigs fiasco. .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba , .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba .postImageUrl , .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba , .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba:hover , .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba:visited , .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba:active { border:0!important; } .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba:active , .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .udbe77178c42184a8715e03a9df67ebba:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Hemophilia 4 EssaySo who really killed JFK, well no one really knows because the governmentburied all evidence deep within secret files for the protection of us. I believe that Oswaldis innocent and just a cover-up man, and it was high powered government officials whohad something to gain from his death. So who killed him, I will leave that to you. Social Issues
Friday, March 6, 2020
The Most Important Day of My Life Essays
The Most Important Day of My Life Essays The Most Important Day of My Life Paper The Most Important Day of My Life Paper In The Most Important Day of My Life, Helen Keller narrates how her patient and loving teacher inspired and enabled her to learn despite her disabilities. The essay is a narrative account of her blossoming from a seven year old girl facing the difficulties of learning with her disabilities to someone who is passionate for learning and discovering things. She begins the story of her educational journey on the day she meets her teacher, Anne Mansfield Sullivan, for the first time. She is just about to be seven years old and has never experienced formal education, largely due to the fact that she is blind, mute and deaf. She describes the anxious moment with luscious detail, capturing her sense of hope and anticipation. Being disabled, Keller thinks of herself as a ââ¬Å"great shipâ⬠in a ââ¬Å"dense fog,â⬠desperate to find light and direction (Keller, 1998, 8). She believes that on that day, the ââ¬Å"light of loveâ⬠begins shining on her life (Keller, 1998, 9). Keller then proceeds to tell the early stages of her education with Sullivan. She describes Sullivanââ¬â¢s simple yet uncanny method of finger play in which Sullivan spells the word doll after giving the young Keller one. Sullivanââ¬â¢s instruction begins to be more complex as she teaches Keller small words and word association to enable Keller in identifying objects around her. Kellerââ¬â¢s blindness makes it difficult for her to appreciate the words associated to things because she has not seen any of it. But Sullivan is patient and persistent. She thinks of creative ways to help Keller appreciate the things she is learning. After breaking the doll she got from Sullivan, Keller is taken by her teacher to the garden where she teaches her the meaning of water, a concept Keller could not understand at first. Sullivanââ¬â¢s creativity pays off and Kellerââ¬â¢s mind opens up to the rich world of language. She says that the ââ¬Å"living word awakened [her] soulâ⬠and that her new found ability to name things has given her hope and light in darkness. She begins to see how she is connected to the world (Keller, 1998, 10). The passion for learning ignites her mind and heart, and things around her suddenly ââ¬Å"quiver with lifeâ⬠(Keller, 1998, 10). She develops sentiment and tenderness as a result of discovering her connection to things. Realizing what she has done to the doll, she tries to put back its pieces together. Besides discovering the passion of learning, Keller also becomes an eager student. She grabs every opportunity to learn what she can. Sullivan widens Kellerââ¬â¢s perspective by relating her thoughts to nature and teaching her its beauty and wonder. Despite the absence of sight, Keller sees and appreciates the works of nature and feels one with it. However, Keller learns that nature is not as kind as she thinks. After getting trapped on top of tree in a thunderstorm, Keller learns fear. It takes her a while to regain her trust in nature and the irresistible charm of the mimosa tree to feel once again her connection to nature. As she climbs the tree by herself, her curiosity for ââ¬Å"doing something unusualâ⬠is revived in her heart (Keller, 1998, 12). Keller realizes that learning language is gradual and for the deaf child, difficult and challenging. But the fruits of discovering language is always rewarding. As she gains more words, her ideas become more complex and her questions incessant. Upon hearing the word love from Sullivan, Keller encounters abstract ideas and begins to grapple with their meaning. Sullivanââ¬â¢s ingenuity enables Keller to associate the abstract with the concrete as Sullivan connects love with familiar concepts such as clouds, rain and flowers. Keller believes that Sullivanââ¬â¢s treatment of her as a normal child has helped her enormously. As Sullivan augments Kellerââ¬â¢s disability through patient repetitions and training, Keller gains confidence to participate in conversations. She is able to overcome the difficulties of her disability by learning from life itself- a life enriched by her gracious teacher. Sullivan has molded her and fulfilled her potential. She has given her hope and ââ¬Å"breathedâ⬠¦love, joy â⬠¦and meaningâ⬠to everything around Keller (Keller, 1998, 14). It is Sullivanââ¬â¢s genius as a teacher, grace for Kellerââ¬â¢s disability and vision for the young girl that has widened the depth and breadth of Kellerââ¬â¢s mind. Keller describes Sullivanââ¬â¢s vision for her student through an image of nature which she has learned from the great teacher. From Sullivan, Keller learns that education is beyond the classroom and beyond the routine teaching of skills and concepts. A teacher must instill in his studentââ¬â¢s mind the freedom he has from learning because this will enable him to face its challenges. Keller concludes by giving homage to Sullivan, pertaining to her as an extension of herself, a person who is in union with her being. It is impossible for her to have the imagination and intelligence she has without the guidance of Sullivan.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)